Andre Fleury Swiss Watch Co.
United States District Court, Northern District Of California
Case number: C-05-4525 EMC, Andre Fleury, et al. V. Richemont North America, Inc.
Plaintiffs attorneys: Mr. Bruce. L. Simon of: Pearson, Simon, Soter, Warsaw & Penny, LLP.
and Mr. Geoffrey Spellberg of: Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson
__________________________________________
Mr. Simon and Mr. Spellberg knowingly misleading ?
They claimed and affirmed a recovery of: $21.5 million on June 2007.
Then on April 02. 2008 they stated a recovery "accurately calculable" as follows:
"Accurately calculable and conservatively total $9,791,800." & "If 400 watchmakers become Newly Qualified Watchmakers and maximize the parts discount, $1.1 million in value would be conferred by the Settlement."
But Judge Chen factual recovery in Doc. 361, shown on the next page is:
$69,406 in coupon at cost value or $222,100 at retail value. Nothing in the millions.
_________________________________
Misleading Email:
"We should not have a problem providing you with that type of letter."
The " letter" was to confirmed I was no longer in the case at Mr. Ryser's request. They intended to coerce him to sign documents intended to me. In the documents was the Evaluation Form I rejected on February 11, 2007 and never heard since. Unknown to me they accepted it.
______________________________________________________
The Case.
Simon/Spellberg
Doc. 231
Note:
Simon/Spellberg
Email June 11, 2007
Note:
Note:
